Posts Tagged Global Warming

What Is Better For The Environment Then The Electric Car? An Electric Motorcycle

By Frank Strider

We are all aware of the fact that the earth is warming up and people all over this planet are trying their best to preserve some of the resources nature has given us. At the same time we are doing the best we can to reduce the damage we have done to the earth.

You do not have to be a believer in global warming or a scientist not even think of your own conspiracy to see that it’s important we don’t use up all of earths resource as if they would never dry out. Emitting Carbon dioxin causes damage to our ozone layer which can’t be repaired. This simple fact is one of the most used reason by people to choose a vehicle that is fuel-efficient the next time they by a new car. And there are people who know that you can get much more miles from a gallon of gasoline when you buy a motorcycle.

Although riding a motorcycle really does save a lot of gasoline and thus helps a lot in preserving the resources of this earth, there is an even better thing to do. Why not buy an electric motorcycle? That would be a fantastic choice if you want a method of transport that you can rely on, that saves you money and also saves the resources of this planet.

Advantages

Yes the initial costs of an electric motorcycle is often higher than a motorcycle that runs on gasoline but they have a lot of good things going for them that really makes it worth the initial investment. The longer you ride on one of them the more money you save, because fuel costs alone is far cheaper then with a gasoline motor, it is about one-tenth of cost.

They are also (almost) silent and extremely friendly for our environment because of the fact that no gas is emitted at all. No dust particles that get in to the air. And as they use electricity you will not be seeing a gas station again you just need to plug it in at home to charge the batteries. Read the rest of this entry »

       

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Green Guise: The Tesla Roadster is a Green Failure

With all the green cheer-leading about the Tesla Roadster, it has been difficult to find the truth. However, I f found something close on The Overrated List and the reader comments:

  • Part car, part bullshit. Buying one seems to require a secret handshake, a briefcase full of cash and a pinky swear to never drive the car in public.
  • A good proof of concept. Not a product. I know greenies that think this is god’s gift. Come on people! it’s for rich posers. Something this impractical, is not green.
  • The Tesla is a bad joke.

Let’s be clear: the Tesla Roadster is a marvelous piece of engineering. It’s beautiful, it’s fast, and it’s all electric.

It’s also ridiculously expensive at over $100,000. That’s what makes the Tesla a failure when it comes to being green. We’re facing a global climate crisis; cutting the vehicle emissions of a handful of ultra-rich people is, well, pointless. What’s next? Making luxury yachts greener?

It’s difficult to criticize any effort to be more environmentally-oriented. For the most part, it’s “why not be green?” However, adopting this kind of mindset is how the Tesla came to be. Being environmentally-orientated is not just about choosing green options; it’s also about reducing, reusing, and recycling. Am I being green if I buy an unneeded super yacht that is 20% greener that other super yachts? No, it’s still an unneeded purchase to will increase my strain on the environment.

The people who buy a Tesla Roadster suffer from what a friend of mine calls “look-at-me syndrome.” The Tesla is simply the newest option for these people to get the attention they want simply because the Tesla has won so much undeserved media attention. People know that it’s obscenely expensive, so the people who drive one must be rich. And just because it’s electric, people seem to think it’s green, so these Tesla buyers are getting a free pass on obnoxious behavior.

Instead of buying a Tesla for well over $100,000, what else could you do to be helping combat climate change? Obviously, you’ll probably still want a vehicle, and there are several options that pretty green. A Prius with the Hymotion plug-in kit is a good way to go, and you could buy about three of them for the same price of a Tesla. After you get your vehicle, you could use the rest of the money to invest in carbon offsets, green start-ups, or number of other areas that will help more than just your ego.

As for Tesla Motors, much remains to be seen. They claim that the Roadster is a jumping-off point to make more affordable electric vehicles for the masses. That’s what needs to be done. Until they get there, they’re just partners-in-crime with the ego-maniacs who buy the Roadsters.

       

,

1 Comment

Waxman-Markey passes the house, but what is it?

If you’ve been following the news, then you’ve probably heard of the Waxman-Markey Act, also know as the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES). It is an energy bill that outlines an emissions cap-and-trade policy. It passed in the House on Friday by the House, but has yet to make it to the Senate. After two Bush terms of inaction on climate change, we’re finally moving in the right direction. Maybe.

The blogosphere and newspaper opinion pages are on fire about whether the bill is a nonsense, just what we need, or somewhere in the middle. A Mother Jones article in the week leading up to the House vote does a good job of summarizing the concern over Waxman-Markey: Pass a flawed climate bill now, or wait for a better one?

Here is the meat of the 1,200-page bill:

  • Set limits emissions limits of carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases: by 2020, emissions need to be 17% below 2005 levels. By 2050, an 80% reduction.
  • Set renewable energy production standards: by 2020, any electricity provider who supplies more than 4 million MWh must produce 20% of it’s supply through a renewable source, such as wind, solar, or geothermal. However, part of this requirement can be met through increasing energy efficiency. Alternatively, an energy supplier can pay $25 per MWh to achieve compliance.
  • Modernization of the American electricity grid.
  • Provides for an expansion in electric vehicle production.
  • Makes large increases to the required levels of energy efficiency in buildings and home appliances.

The emissions weren’t a much as President Obama had hoped for, or as much as many European counterparts have adopted, but it’s a start. A new article today pointed out that the new law could upset the voluntary market, such as companies trying to green up their image by buying offsets. The provisions for energy efficiency increases in buildings could lead to some pretty neat things.

However, the bill has yet to be tested in the Senate. With Al Franken making Democrat #60 in the Senate, we’ll just have to wait to see if that means anything.

       

, ,

No Comments

The price of oil is rising again - here’s why.

This article by Brian O’Keefe, senor editor at CNNmoney.com, is reprinted with permission. Thank to Brian for allowing us to share this on the Driving Change Blog!

Prices have doubled since February, but that’s probably not the end of it. Asia’s recovery is igniting demand.

Ask a group of oil analysts about the recent surge in crude costs and here’s the consensus answer you’ll get: Prices have run up too far, too fast and they aren’t supported by the fundamentals.

Ask them about where prices will be two years from now, however, and the majority will offer this prediction: A lot higher.

“We’re concerned about oil prices rising so rapidly in the near-term,” says Hussein Allidina, head of commodities research at Morgan Stanley. “But the bet in the long-term is one way, and that’s just up.”

Oil shot past $70 a barrel last week, meaning the cost per barrel has doubled since hitting a low in mid-February. And the swiftness of that move has plenty of observers wondering if we’re headed toward another period of even more dramatic price gains.

Among the oil insiders worried about such a scenario is Royal Dutch Shell CEO Jeroen van der Veer, a 38-year veteran of the energy giant, who is scheduled to retire June 30. “If the oil prices stay volatile I’m afraid there will be too much slowdown in investment,” he said at an energy conference in Abu Dhabi in early June, according to Reuters, while reiterating that Shell would follow through on its spending plans for this year. “I think too low capacity means the next price spike is to come.”

The last spike, of course, was a year ago at this time, when oil zoomed all the way up to $147 per barrel and Congress began holding hearings to discuss whether speculators were manipulating prices. Then a market correction that began in the middle of last summer was accelerated by the global financial crisis. Oil plunged to multi-year lows, with the price of benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude dropping under $35 in December and again in February.

To understand the odds of oil moving back above $100, it helps to first examine the reasons that the price has rebounded so strongly in recent weeks.

Much of the recent rally actually has nothing to do with the oil market’s current supply-and-demand situation. The latest estimate from the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects that worldwide oil use will be almost 2.5 million barrels a day lower on average this year than in 2008. And despite the fact that OPEC has been cutting back on production since last September to boost prices, oil inventories around the world are still high compared to historical levels.

“Considering that supply seems ample and demand is weak, the fact that oil is going up looks kind of weird,” says Adam Sieminski, chief energy economist at Deutsche Bank. “But those factors are being overwhelmed by a huge sigh of relief that we’re not going to have the Great Depression. A lot of money is coming out of mattresses.”

That inflow is lifting stocks and commodities alike. Research by Morgan Stanley found the correlation between crude oil prices and equities has recently been at a record high — with both rising strongly on the hope that the economic cycle has already bottomed.

“Historically, equities have been a leading indicator of economic growth and commodities have been a coincident indicator,” says Morgan Stanley’s Allidina. “Right now you’re seeing commodities and equities move up together as money comes back in at the same time.”

Just as important, Morgan Stanley found that the inverse correlation between a weakening U.S. dollar and rising crude prices was also closing in on a record high. Because oil is priced in dollars, when the value of the dollar falls it makes oil cheaper in other currencies — simultaneously boosting consumption outside the U.S. and motivating non-U.S. producers to raise prices to make up for the purchasing power they’ve lost in the currency conversion.

Concerns about the ballooning deficit in the U.S. have caused investors to begin fleeing the dollar. The U.S. dollar index, which measures the value of the greenback against six major world currencies, has dropped 9% since the beginning of March. As it falls, oil prices are rising. If it falls further, they’ll rise higher.

But just how high oil prices go from here — and how fast they get there — will ultimately depend on the ability of producers to meet future demand. And any robust rebound in consumption is sure to put a strain on global supply.

The investment cutbacks warned about by Shell’s Van der Veer only make that more likely. In its World Energy Outlook 2008, released last November, the IEA warned that production declines from existing supplies would keep the market tight and called for $26 trillion in new infrastructure spending worldwide over the next two decades. Right now, the opposite is happening. In May, the IEA said it expected a 21% drop in oil and gas investment budgets globally in 2009 compared to 2008, or nearly $100 billion less. A cautious OPEC has said that a lot of its member countries’ new drilling projects remain on hold.

Meanwhile, there are signs that a demand recovery could be on the way in Asia. China’s crude consumption averaged 7.6 million barrels per day in April, according to Allidina, the highest level on record, amid reports that the government was stockpiling commodities. Goldman Sachs was confident enough of a demand rebound to come out in early June with a price target of $85 a barrel for West Texas Intermediate crude by the end of 2009 and $95 by the end of 2010.

Deutsche Bank’s Sieminski agrees that prices are going higher over time. “Our forecast has been that oil will be at $100 in 2015 and it could happen faster if the economy recovers,” he says. Because oil is generally considered an “inelastic” commodity — meaning it takes a big increase in price to produce a small change in demand — the chances of a spike increase once supplies get tight.

“If you get close to the balance, prices can go haywire very quickly and there’s very little that can be done about it,” says Sieminski. “Something happens on the margin to put pressure on the market and instead of the price adjustment being gradual it’s a step change. Last time gasoline had to go to $4 a gallon and crude had to go to $150 a barrel to rebalance things. And that’s how we could get there again.”

Let’s hope we don’t get there for a while.

       

, ,

No Comments

Diesel: Curent Vehicle Options and Upcoming Models

This is the last post of a three-part diesel series. Part one talked about why diesel is more expensive than gasoline. Part two discussed why diesel consumer vehicles are relatively rare in the United States.

Diesel is a great option for consumers looking for a new car, but what exactly is out there? Since only about 3% of consumer vehicles are diesel-powered, it’s not a surprise if you can’t name too many diesel cars. Don’t fret! Virtually every manufacturer has a diesel model in the works, and some are even selling them now. So, let’s get to it, starting with what is being sold now in the United States. It’s also worth mentioning that there are tax credits available for several of these vehicles!

(Model, starting price, city/hwy mpg from fueleconomy.gov)

  • Volkswagen Clean Diesel TDI
  • Audi
    • Q7 TDI, $50,900, 17/25 mpg
  • Mercedes-Benz
    • R32 BlueTEC Crossover, $49,150, 18/24 mpg
    • E320 BlueTEC Sedan, $52,900, 23/32 mpg
    • ML320 BlueTEC SUV, $48,600, 18/24 mpg
  • BMW
    • 335d Sedan, $43,900, 23/36 mpg
    • X5 xDrive35d SUV, $51,200, 19/26

So, those are your current new car diesel options. Volkswagen is leading the pack, but they’ve been doing that with diesels for a long time now. The other available diesels are, shall we say, more luxurious. The least expensive non-VW has a starting price tag of more than double the Jetta! Luckily, many other manufacturers have diesel models in the works that will be much more affordable! So, what diesel options will be coming to America? None of these are guaranteed, but if current diesels start performing well, expect to see some, if not all, of the following models.

  • Acura TSX Sedan, but is currently facing an “indefinite” delay. Maybe for 2010, but our fingers are crossed.
  • Kia Borrego SUV. This one maybe currently shelved as well.
  • Subaru Impreza and Forester.
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD. This may actually be currently available, but the site is vague, and I’ve heard very little about it.
  • Nissan Maxima Sedan. Maybe for 2010.
       

, , , ,

No Comments