Archive for July, 2009
Green Guise: The Tesla Roadster is a Green Failure
Posted by Jeffrey in Green Guise on July 27th, 2009
With all the green cheer-leading about the Tesla Roadster, it has been difficult to find the truth. However, I f found something close on The Overrated List and the reader comments:
- Part car, part bullshit. Buying one seems to require a secret handshake, a briefcase full of cash and a pinky swear to never drive the car in public.
- A good proof of concept. Not a product. I know greenies that think this is god’s gift. Come on people! it’s for rich posers. Something this impractical, is not green.
- The Tesla is a bad joke.
Let’s be clear: the Tesla Roadster is a marvelous piece of engineering. It’s beautiful, it’s fast, and it’s all electric.
It’s also ridiculously expensive at over $100,000. That’s what makes the Tesla a failure when it comes to being green. We’re facing a global climate crisis; cutting the vehicle emissions of a handful of ultra-rich people is, well, pointless. What’s next? Making luxury yachts greener?
It’s difficult to criticize any effort to be more environmentally-oriented. For the most part, it’s “why not be green?” However, adopting this kind of mindset is how the Tesla came to be. Being environmentally-orientated is not just about choosing green options; it’s also about reducing, reusing, and recycling. Am I being green if I buy an unneeded super yacht that is 20% greener that other super yachts? No, it’s still an unneeded purchase to will increase my strain on the environment.
The people who buy a Tesla Roadster suffer from what a friend of mine calls “look-at-me syndrome.” The Tesla is simply the newest option for these people to get the attention they want simply because the Tesla has won so much undeserved media attention. People know that it’s obscenely expensive, so the people who drive one must be rich. And just because it’s electric, people seem to think it’s green, so these Tesla buyers are getting a free pass on obnoxious behavior.
Instead of buying a Tesla for well over $100,000, what else could you do to be helping combat climate change? Obviously, you’ll probably still want a vehicle, and there are several options that pretty green. A Prius with the Hymotion plug-in kit is a good way to go, and you could buy about three of them for the same price of a Tesla. After you get your vehicle, you could use the rest of the money to invest in carbon offsets, green start-ups, or number of other areas that will help more than just your ego.
As for Tesla Motors, much remains to be seen. They claim that the Roadster is a jumping-off point to make more affordable electric vehicles for the masses. That’s what needs to be done. Until they get there, they’re just partners-in-crime with the ego-maniacs who buy the Roadsters. Shame on all of you.
Who wants to be an “Ecotown?”
Posted by Jeffrey in General News on July 22nd, 2009
The Green Car Company was in the news yesterday! KOMO news had a short article about four cities vying to be the new home of the company. The Green Car Company is a “pioneer,” and Kirkland, Bellevue, Seattle, and Issaquah want to boost their green image.
Range anxiety?
Posted by Jeffrey in General News on July 16th, 2009
I happened upon the the phrase ¨range anxiety,¨which is used to describe the fear that your electric vehicle will run out of juice somewhere and leave you stranded. Though the phrase is not new, I noticed that it is suddenly appearing in a many places, such as this Vancouver Sun article about building a charging infrstructure and this New York Times article talking about getting people to overcome the range anxiety and buy an EV.
I´m wondering if the proliferation of EVs will result in the proliferation of new medications to deal with this new opportunity for anxiety. Chevy seems to be doing all it can to convince people that range is not something you need to be concerned about. We´ll see.
Mmmm. Have you heard of Burgerville?
Posted by Jeffrey in General News on July 14th, 2009
Do you fancy a tasty burger that is also environmentally conscious? Well, welcome to Burgerville, a company who’s mission statement is to “Serve with Love.”
While driving down I-5 some time ago, I stopped at a Burgerville restaurant and learned much more than I had anticipated. Here was a “fast food” restaurant that uses local ingredients, purchases wind energy, and is intensely-focused on recycling. Did I mention how tasty the food was?!
I had a Tillamook Cheeseburger, Walla Walla onion rings, and a delicious real pumpkin shake. Take a look at their menu page.
Unfortunately for those of us in the Seattle area, there aren’t many Burgerville restaurants close to us. (The nearest one is in Centralia.) However, if you’re heading into the Portland area (or live there), show Burgerville that you care about the environment too, and then eat some delicious food!
What is green car insurance?
Posted by Jeffrey in General News on July 13th, 2009
“If you have a green car, then you need green car insurance.” Maybe.
I happened up on the idea of “green car insurance” not long ago, and I thought I should share it with all of you. Nearly all the information I’ve found has been the U.K., but it’s interesting. The idea is pretty straight forward: an environmentally-oriented insurance company limits its coverage to green cars, includes carbon offsetting in the cost, and makes you feel good. This U.K. company, The Green Insurance Company, seems to have a good model. They recycle 99% of the company’s recyclable waste, offset the company’s own emissions, and donate 5% of profits to charitable causes.
The question is, do you need an insurance company like that? If the “green” insurance provides all the same coverage, good customer service, and costs the same amount of money as “ungreen” insurance, then the answer is an easy one. Indeed, the U.K. company I read about claims to offer all the environmentally-friendly trimmings without costing you extra. However, if you have to pay a little extra to get that “green” title, then I would be a little skeptical.
Most of you are probably familiar with carbon offsetting. (If not, have a visit to TerraPass.) Buying carbon offsets for a fuel-efficient vehicle costs about $30 for an entire year through TerraPass. So, if you’re willing to pay more than that on the green car insurance, maybe you should just buy your own carbon offsets instead of paying a premium to the insurance agency. It’s not really so simple though; perhaps you simply want to support companies who are making environmentally-sound behavioral choices. If that’s the case, then voting with your dollars is a form of advocacy.
I casually tried to look up the “green” credentials for a few insurance providers, but that information is not often easily found. I want to know how badly Pemco cares about the environment. Or State Farm or Progressive. Until we have something as straight forward as this U.K. insurance company, we’ll just have to wonder about the insurance providers here in the United States.